|
|
3GTW
Plan of Action
for Demand-Driven Taxonomic Capacity Building
Partner commitments to date to a strategy for delivering
taxonomic capacity and products needed by users, including those in
the following sectors: agriculture; forestry; marine, environment
managers; conservationists; policy and decision makers; indigenous
and local communities; private sector (national and multinational);
publicly-owned companies; ecotourism; biosecurity; biosafety; Access
and benefit sharing; bioindicators; biotechnology and health issues
(including emerging diseases).
Strategy
element |
Actions
identified by 3GTW Partners |
Partners
committed to date |
| 1.
End-user focus:
Meet
stakeholder needs |
1.
Form partnerships with users
2.
Incorporate market research techniques in assessing stakeholder
needs, including methods of ensuring stakeholder take-up of
taxonomic products
3.
Needs assessments, including identifying full range of stakeholders
and users
4.
Make taxonomic products more
relevant to non-taxonomic issues
5.
Improve stabilisation of names and develop concordencies between
different classifications
6.
Increase the rate at which species are identified
7.
Establish discussion fora.
8.
Include feedback on products from users and ‘lessons learned’
in projects
9.
Assist with delivery of products
10.
Sharing of biodiversity
data with developing country end-users
11.
Coordination
(regional) |
1.
GBIF, IPPC, ITIS, GISP, ICIPE, IUCN, RBGK, SP2000, UNESCO
2.
-
3.
GBIF, GISP, ICIPE, NHM, UNESCO, WFCC
4.
ABRS, GBIF, GISP, ICIPE, ITIS, RBGK, SP2000, SPP
5.
GBIF, ITIS, NHM, RBGK, SP2000
6.
GBIF, RBGK
7.
GBIF, IUCN
8.
GBIF, GISP, IUCN
9.
ABRS, GISP, SPP, UNESCO, WFCC
10.
ENBI
11.
BioNET LOOPs,
|
| 2.
Political partnership:
Generate
effective political and multi-sectoral commitment to fulfill
national and international obligations. |
1.
Raise profile of taxonomy with key sectors of society, including
policy and decision makers;
2.
Work with CBD and other conventions and related UN bodies;
3.
Participate in bodies reporting to government on biodiversity
issues;
4.
Engage decision makers;
5.
Conduct media campaigns;
6.
Develop education programmes;
7.
Participate in global initiative on biodiversity communication,
education and public awareness (CEPA)
8.
Awareness raising through Interim Commission on Phytosanitary
Measures regarding need for support to taxonomy
9.
Champion taxonomy nationally and regionally
10.
Coordination
(regional) |
1.
ABRS, GBIF, GISP, ICIPE, IUCN, NHM, RBGK, SP2000, SPP,
UNESCO, WFCC
2.
ABRS, GBIF, GISP, IUCN, SPP, UNESCO
3.
ABRS, GBIF, GISP, ICIPE, IUCN, RBGK
4.
ABRS, GBIF, GISP, ICIPE, IUCN, RBGK, UNESCO
5.
GBIF,
6.
GBIF, NHM, UNESCO
7.
UNESCO
8.
IPPC
9.
ABRS
10. BioNET
LOOPs |
| 3.
Global partnership:
Enhance
collaboration, cooperation and partnerships, building to global
scales |
1.
strengthen networking between institutes, individuals and countries;
2.
improve effectiveness of focal points;
3.
Drive pro-action of groups, networks and societies in linking
together;
4.
Promote Access and Benefit-sharing for inclusiveness of all
5.
Increase collaboration with BioNET-INTERNATIONAL LOOPs
6.
CBD-IPPC collaboration activities
7.
Continue to write, publish & distribute Species Plantarum
Flora of the World
8.
Coordination (regional) |
1.
CETAF, GBIF, IUCN, NHM, UNESCO
2.
GBIF, NHM
3.
ABRS, GBIF, IUCN, NHM, UNESCO
4.
GBIF, IUCN, RGBK, WFCC
5.
UNESCO, WFCC
6.
GISP, IPPC,
7.
ABRS, SPP
8.
BioNET LOOPs |
| 4.
Awareness and
action:
Improve
access to and analysis of policy level information within the
taxonomic community. |
1.
develop and sustain awareness of taxonomy in development programme
processes and objectives.
2.
develop and sustain awareness of NBSAPs
3.
develop and sustain awareness of relevant Convention decisions;
4.
develop and sustain awareness of donor policy backgrounds.
5.
Analyze information obtained to relate taxonomic output to development
objectives
6.
Contribute to harmonising the format of national reports under
various conventions.
7.
Promote support to taxonomy as it relates to phytosanitary issues
of National Plant Protection Organisations (NPPOs)
8.
Liase through International Phytosanitary Portal (in future)
9.
Build awareness of taxonomic networks among Regional Plant Protection
organisations
10.
Coordination
(regional) |
1.
ABRS, GISP, IUCN, WFCC
2.
IUCN, WFCC
3.
ABRS, GISP, NHM, IUCN, RBGK, WFCC
4.
GISP, IUCN, WFCC
5.
GISP, IUCN, WFCC
6.
IUCN
7.
ABRS, GISP, IPPC
8.
IPPC
9.
BioNET LOOPs
10.
BioNET LOOPs |
| 5.
Capacity building:
Build
human and infrastructural capacity to meet sustainable development
needs |
1.
develop long-term strategy for sustaining capacity
2.
develop capacity within current structures and processes;
3.
identify and include new elements, structures and processes;
4.
improve access to new information technologies
5.
Access and mobilise resources
6.
Assist in development of curricula in tertiary institutions
7.
Pursue current activities in relation to training in taxonomy
and parataxonomy
8.
Help assess taxonomic needs assessments for NPPOs using “Phytosanitary
Capacity Evaluation”
9.
Advanced training in taxonomy, curation and other relevant disciplines
10.
Establish Regional
Biodiversity Centres based on existing infrastructure
11.
Coordination
(regional) |
1.
GBIF, GISP, IUCN, RBGK, UNESCO
2.
ABRS, CABI, GBIF, GISP, IUCN, NHM, SPP, UNESCO, WFCC
3.
GBIF, GISP, UNESCO
4.
GBIF, GISP, RBGK
5.
GBIF, GISP
6.
UNESCO
7.
UNESCO, ABRS
8.
IPPC
9.
CABI, University of Amsterdam, National Herbarium (Netherlands),
10.
CABI, ICIPE,
WFCC
11.
BioNET LOOPs |
| 6.
Science:
Sustainably
maintain and enhance taxonomic science skills and knowledge
base to enable responsiveness to emerging needs |
1.
Support and strengthen existing collections, institutions and
networks;
2.
Generate interest in taxonomy as a science and encourage people
to join discipline; find mechanisms and incentives for employing
taxonomists
3.
Develop and improve training programmes and curricula;
4.
Develop mechanisms for linking taxonomists to end users;
5.
Complete the catalogue of life
6.
Adoption of new technologies/techniques
7.
Coordination (regional) |
|
| 7.
Taxonomic information:
Improve
access to and exchange of taxonomic information and products
[This
is one of GBIF’s major goals] |
1.
Decrease publication time for taxonomic works;
2.
Improve accessibility of publications;
3.
Develop and link databases of taxonomic information;
4.
Improve access to specimens and data
5.
Exploit appropriate information technology;
6.
Improve access and communication among experts;
7.
Improve transfer and interpretation of taxonomic products from
providers to users
8.
Coordination (regional) |
1.
ABRS, GBIF, SPP, UNESCO
2.
ABRS, Fauna Europea, GBIF, RBGK, SPP
3.
ABRS, European Catalogue of Names GBIF, ITIS, IUCN-SIS, NHM,
NSF, RBGK, SP2000, SPP
4.
ABRS, ENBI, GBIF, ITIS, IUCN, NHM, RBGK, WFCC
5.
ABRS, ENBI, ETI, GBIF, ITIS, IUCN, NHM, RBGK, SP2000, WFCC
6.
ETI, GBIF, GISP, IUCN, SP2000, WFCC
7.
ETI, GBIF, GISP, ITIS, RBGK, SP2000, UNESCO, WFCC
8.
BioNET LOOPs |
| 8.
Timeliness:
Accelerate
the full taxonomic cycle: discovery, description,
|
1.
Improve and develop new tools and technologies in taxonomic
research;
2.
Improve response times – provide quicker and more accurate identification
and description;
3.
Examine new approaches to components of the cycle and cycle
in total
4.
Coordination (regional) |
1.
ETI, GBIF, NHM, RBGK, WFCC
2.
ABRS, ETI, GBIF, NHM, SPP, WFCC
3.
ABRS, UNESCO, WFCC
4.
BioNET LOOPs |
| 9.
Resourcing:
Access
and mobilise resources ( ensure resources are available for
production of appropriate product) |
1.
Identify new resources via new areas of application (e.g. trade;
expand ecotourism products to new groups)
2.
Enhance skills/institutional capacity in writing/managing successful
proposals
3.
Improve communication skills
4.
Improve media relation skills
5.
Develop co-funding partnerships based on end-user needs
6.
Assist with workshops aimed at developing project proposals
for funding
7.
Participate in fundraising nationally, regionally and globally
8.
Coordination (regional) |
|
|